Posts

Showing posts from January, 2022

Section 170 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 170. Cases to be sent to Magistrate, when evidence is sufficient. (1) If, upon an investigation under this Chapter, it appears to the officer in charge of the police station that there is sufficient evidence or reasonable ground as aforesaid, such officer shall forward the accused under custody to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence upon a police report and to try the accused or commit him for trial, or, if the offence is bailable and the accused is able to give security, shall take security from him for his appearance before such Magistrate on a day fixed and for his attendance from day to day before such Magistrate until otherwise directed. (2) When the officer in charge of a police station forward an accused person to a Magistrate or takes security for his appearance before such Magistrate under this section, he shall send to such Magistrate any weapon or other article which it may be necessary to produce before him, and shall require the complainant (if

A single lawyer argue for both petitioner and respondent in the same case (assuming he is a disinterested but sincere and loyal lawyer).

#In a case of mutual divorce generally lawyer is same or lawyers are from same legal firm. # Petitioner and the Respondent do not trust, so same lawyer cannot argue. As people believe for argument two are needed. However parties in disagreement can arrive at a consensus and can settle the matter. Same can be granted in court of law. # Ego of parties in disagreement leads to prolong litigation. As no one wants to budge. # Court of law always want that the petitioner and respondent should compromise legally. But parties in disagreement want to go ahead with everlasting litigation. Thus appeal goes on till the Apex court. # Everything is possible but people do not want. # So whatever people want becomes a practice in any field.